18 Mar
Westminster Hall
Free School Meals

The Westminster Hall session focused on the provision of free school meals (FSM) amidst a backdrop of increasing child poverty and the rising cost of living in the UK. The debate was led by Liz Jarvis (Liberal Democrats), who highlighted the current challenges faced by schools and families in implementing and accessing FSM due to stringent eligibility criteria and insufficient government funding.

The discussion underscored the importance of free meals in ensuring all children receive proper nutrition, which in turn affects their ability to concentrate, learn, and perform better academically. Several MPs shared insights from their constituencies, emphasizing the necessity for reform in the FSM eligibility process and funding allocations.

Significant talks centered around:

  1. Eligibility Threshold: Several MPs called for raising the income threshold for FSM qualification. Currently, only families earning below £7,400 qualify, leaving many children in poverty without access to free meals.
  2. Funding Constraints: Concerns were raised over the disparity between government funding for school meals and actual catering costs, leading schools to supplement from already stretched budgets.
  3. Quality and Nutritious Food: It was highlighted that affordable breakfast clubs and high-nutritional meals improve student behavior, performance, and long-term health outcomes.
  4. Administrative Burdens: The administrative complexity of applying for FSM was discussed, with suggestions to introduce auto-enrolment to simplify access and improve uptake.
  5. Holiday Meal Provision: Clive Jones and others advocated ensuring FSM provisions extend during school holidays to cover gaps like in holiday hunger.

Outcome

  • The debate highlighted an overwhelming consensus on the need to revisit the eligibility criteria and administrative processes for FSM to ensure more children benefit.
  • Calls were made for the UK Government to increase FSM funding to reflect true costs and consider auto-enrolment strategies similar to successful local authority trials.
4.3 million children

The number of children living in poverty in the UK.

Key Statistics with Context

  • 4.3 million children live in poverty across the UK, with 900,000 ineligible under current FSM income criteria.
  • Schools reported financial shortfalls, with some catering costs exceeding government funding by up to £0.62 per meal.
  • 21% of children in MPs’ constituencies benefit from FSM, but many more are in need but not eligible.
£0.62 per meal shortfall

Funding differential faced by some UK schools per FSM provided.

Speaker Analysis

21% of children

Percentage of children benefiting from FSM in certain constituencies, highlighting regional disparities.

Outcome

The pressing issues related to free school meals need to be addressed, with suggested reforms including increasing eligibility thresholds and funding to meet actual costs. Urgent government action is needed to tackle the systemic issues contributing to child hunger and ensure equitable access to free school meals.

Key Contributions

Liz JarvisMP
Liberal Democrats

Moved the motion to reconsider free school meals in light of insufficient funding, urging for increased eligibility and funding reforms.

Clive JonesMP
Liberal Democrats

Stressed need for extending FSM to holidays from his council leadership experiences.

Kim JohnsonMP
Labour

Highlighted the 'postcode lottery' nature of FSM across the UK, citing significant regional differences in access.

Alison BennettMP
Liberal Democrats

Spoke on financial strains of retrospective funding models, sharing school-specific budget impacts due to meal cost shortfalls.

Marie GoldmanMP
Liberal Democrats

Argued for improved food quality, addressing health outcomes and educational performance links on nutritional grounds.

Ian ByrneMP
Labour

Linked FSM access to historic poverty levels, urging for universal FSM in primary schools.

Claire YoungMP
Liberal Democrats

Addressed logistical and financial difficulties in delivering FSM with existing catering arrangements post-devolution by local councils.

Terry JermyMP
Labour

Brought up administrative challenges leading to partial FSM uptake among eligible students.

Jim ShannonMP
DUP

Provided a Northern Ireland view, stressing similarities in FSM challenges across the UK.

Dr Danny ChambersMP
Liberal Democrats

Spoke on the nutritional and economic benefits of universal FSM, pinpointing long-term health care savings and reduced societal inequalities.

Munira WilsonMP
Liberal Democrats

Debated for auto-enrolment and revised income thresholds for FSM eligibility, arguing for more targeted approaches amidst fiscal constraints.

Damian HindsMP
Conservative

Noted past government expansions of FSM eligibility and income thresholds; called for regular reviews and potential adaptations to existing protocols.

Original Transcript
Liz Jarvis
Eastleigh
LD
09:31

I beg to move, That this House has considered free school meals. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Dowd. It is a great honour to introduce this debate on free school meals—the first opportunity to discuss this important issue since the general election.

Today’s debate was prompted by my conversations with primary school teachers in my constituency, who told me of their concerns at the lack of funding for free school meals and breakfast clubs.

The number of children in our country going to school hungry is unacceptable, and that impacts families in my constituency of Eastleigh and across the UK. The chance to have the best start in life should be available to all children, regardless of background.

The cost of living crisis has driven countless families into hardship. The Government’s own figures estimate that 4.3 million children, or 30% of all children in the UK, are living in poverty, with the figure at 21% in my constituency. As of January 2024, 18.

5% of pupils in Eastleigh—that is 2,426 children—were entitled to benefit-based free school meals, yet we know many more who would benefit from a free school meal do not meet the strict eligibility criteria and miss out.

The Government must look at this issue with the urgency it requires, because those children are being failed.

Clive Jones
Wokingham
LD
09:32

While I was the leader of Wokingham borough council, I ensured that we funded free school meals during the school holidays for children who received them during term time.

That was absolutely the right thing to do to ensure that children were not left hungry and at a disadvantage because of their background. The Times reports that 1 million children face losing their free school meals. Does my hon.

Friend agree that that is troubling, and that the Government must ensure that children entitled to free school meals continue to receive them during school holidays?

Liz Jarvis
09:33

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point, and I absolutely agree. I also congratulate him on the work that he did at the council to ensure that children did not go hungry in the school holidays. I wish more and more councils were able to do that.

How are children supposed to get good grades at school, engage in sports and achieve their dreams for a better future if they are hungry? Four in five teachers told the National Education Union that they see children unable to concentrate due to the impact of deprivation.

Polling of 10,000 teachers across England conducted by School Food Matters showed that a quarter of teachers have used their own money to feed children. For families who are struggling, a free school meal would make a huge difference.

When children are well fed, they perform better at school, are healthier, and have improved long-term outcomes.

Kim Johnson
Liverpool Riverside
Lab
09:33

I thank the hon. Member for securing this important debate, particularly as we might be about to receive the outcome of the child poverty strategy review. Does the hon. Member agree that we have a postcode lottery at the moment?

Three schools in Liverpool posted postcards to the Prime Minister saying that we needed to do away with the postcode lottery, because if you live in London, Scotland or Wales, you receive free school meals.

Do you agree that children going to school hungry in the sixth richest economy in the world is a scourge on this country?

Peter Dowd
in the Chair
09:33

Order. Will Members address the Chair, not one another directly, please?

Liz Jarvis
09:34

The hon. Lady made an excellent point, and I trust the Minister will address it later in the debate.

One headteacher in my constituency who leads a school of over 600 pupils told me the only way he would be able to resource breakfast clubs is to extend the teachers’ directed time and remove some of the vital continuing professional development interventions and clubs that support disadvantaged pupils.

He worries that he will have to cut back on those initiatives to free up time to run breakfast clubs. Mrs Strong, headteacher at Chander’s Ford infant school, told me that, although the cost of school meals has increased, the funding schools receive has not kept pace.

Alison Bennett
Mid Sussex
LD
09:35

My hon. Friend makes a point that I want to draw out. Gattons infant school in Burgess Hill in my constituency is paid £2.53 per meal, but the caterers charge it £3.15 per meal, so there is a shortfall of 62p per meal per child per day, which amounts to £7,839 over a year.

Added to that, the caterers now charge the school an additional £2,000 per year to take away all the waste from the meals. That is a colossal amount of money for a small infant school to sustain. Does my hon. Friend agree that schools should be compensated for the true cost of free school meals?

Liz Jarvis
09:36

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. Schools are now being forced to subsidise meals from their already overstretched budgets, which takes away from vital resources such as staff salaries and school supplies.

For Chander’s Ford infant school, the cost of providing meals now exceeds Government funding by £1.11 per meal, forcing it to find another £31,468 out of its budget for the financial year.

Schools should not be forced to cut services or make tough decisions to cover the cost of meals that should be fully funded.

Marie Goldman
Chelmsford
LD
09:36

My hon. Friend said that it is important that children are well fed, and I want to focus on the word “well”. Does she agree that this is about not just the amount of food that we provide for children, but the quality?

It is really important that children receive highly nutritious content that releases energy slowly throughout the day and enables them to concentrate.

Does she agree that, given that school face such difficulties with their budgets, there is an understandable temptation to look at less costly solutions for food, which is potentially very dangerous for children’s long-term health outcomes and ability to learn?

Peter Dowd
in the Chair
09:42

I remind Members that they should bob if they wish to be called to speak in the debate.

Peter Dowd
in the Chair
09:49

I assure the hon. Gentleman that the smile was for both reasons.

Helen Maguire
Epsom and Ewell
LD
10:00

The hon. Gentleman makes a point about those who are eligible. Schoolchildren in my constituency are complaining about bus services in Epsom and Ewell. They cannot get on to some of the buses, which means they are incredibly late for school.

That is one of the reasons why they miss the breakfast option. While I welcome the introduction of free breakfast clubs, does the hon. Gentleman agree that free hot lunches are key to helping those who need them most? Those who are not there for breakfast also cannot get lunch.

However, if they had a free hot lunch, even if they are late to school, they would still be able to have a hot meal.

Chris Bloore
Redditch
Lab
11:22

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Dowd. The hon. Gentleman makes an interesting point.

However, as a new Member who strongly welcomes the new breakfast club initiative, I point out that in my constituency, like many others, only one in 10 schools currently offers a free breakfast club to children.

Many of the schools that do offer one rely on companies such as Greggs, and the generosity of parents and teachers to put on the clubs.

While I understand that there may be some kinks in the system as we roll out the early adoption scheme, is it not better that the Government are stepping forward, providing funding and working with teachers and schools, rather than relying on the generosity of private businesses and the teachers themselves?

Liz Jarvis

I thank all the Members who have spoken in this debate.

The biggest takeaways for me are that the way to ensure that all children have enough to eat at school is to raise the threshold for families who qualify for free school meals, to scrap the two-child benefit cap and to have auto-enrolment for free school meals.

I urge the Government to listen to the lived experiences of teachers who are trying to deliver free school meals or breakfast clubs, because they are all struggling, in my constituency and across the UK. It is really important that the Government take that on board. Question put and agreed to.

Resolved, That this House has considered free school meals.

All content derived from official parliamentary records