This question session centered on how the UK government plans to support individuals on the lowest incomes in light of the recent spring statement. The discourse touched on employment, welfare reforms, financial independence, tax strategies, and universal credit sufficiency.
Ms. Diane Abbott initiated the session by emphasizing the importance of financial independence and advocating for improved work conditions as a means to support the lowest income earners. She highlighted a significant policy change—the 6.7% increase in the national living wage—and introduced the pathways to work Green Paper proposal.
Increase in the national living wage for full-time workers, resulting in a £1,400 annual gain.
James Murray responded by elucidating the fiscal reforms announced at the last autumn Budget as strategic for ensuring the wealthy pay their fair share of tax and for maintaining a sustainable welfare system.
Zöe Franklin raised concerns after engaging with a local debt support team, spotlighting the inadequacies of universal credit to cover living costs in high-expense areas.
Proposed investment in employment, health, and skills support via the pathways to work Green Paper.
James Murray countered this by detailing the adjustments in universal credit repayment rates designed to alleviate financial strain.
James Wild (shadow Minister) challenged the government's approach, questioning the effects of increased business taxes on economic growth and those on low incomes. Murray defended the government's tax relief efforts aimed at easing financial burdens on businesses over the long term.
Potential earnings from a proposed 2% tax on individuals with over £10 million in assets.
The new cap on deductions from universal credit, reduced from 25%.
Number of impoverished families with children benefiting from the reduced repayment rate cap.
Outcome
The session highlighted divisions in approach to supporting low-income individuals, with opposition members questioning the broader impacts of the government's fiscal policies on vulnerable populations, while ministers emphasized reforms to make benefits sustainable and promote employment.
Key Contributions
Questioned the government's decision to cut personal independence payments and challenged the refusal of wealth taxes to support the vulnerable.
Defended welfare reforms as fair and supportive of sustainable benefits, emphasizing long-term financial fixes and employment as poverty alleviation.
Addressed insufficiency of universal credit to meet increased living costs identified by local debt support teams.
Criticized the government's fiscal measures as detrimental to business and queried the promise to avoid further tax hikes.
All content derived from official parliamentary records