The Question session focused on the potential impact of changes to agricultural property relief and business property relief on farmers in the UK.

Main Content:

1. Mr Alistair Carmichael's Inquiry:
   • Mr Carmichael questioned whether a meeting with farming representatives would be arranged to discuss the impact of proposed tax relief changes on farmers. His inquiry followed growing concerns about how such changes could affect the agricultural sector's financial health.

1. James Murray’s Response:
   • James Murray, in charge of the UK tax system, highlighted his extensive engagements with key farming and agricultural bodies since the autumn Budget of the previous year. Notably, he and the Minister for Food Security had convened with organizations such as the National Farmers Union and the Farmers Union of Wales.

1. Follow-up by Mr Carmichael:
   • Mr Carmichael criticized the absence of the Chancellor in addressing the inquiry, suggesting a neglect towards farmers. He urged a broader consultation including banks and supermarkets to validate the prevailing concerns within the farming community.

1. James Murray’s Defense:
   • Murray reiterated his forensic engagement with relevant organizations, suggesting the discussions have been extensive though differing opinions on the approach remain evident.

Outcome:

• The discussion highlighted a perceived gap between government actions and farmer expectations, though it concluded without any new commitments or major concessions from the government.

Statistics with Context:

• Several high-profile meetings with farming associations and other stakeholders post-autumn Budget indicate the government's attempt at stakeholder engagement:
  • Feb 18 Meeting: Involvement of major national farming bodies, evidencing multi-sector inclusivity.